
Poor Adam Gilchrist! I seriously feel for the man and don’t even want to imagine the kind of response that awaits him when he comes to India come 2009 for the 2nd edition of the IPL. As it is, he’s got a headache of sorts trying to lead a team that ended up getting the 'wooden spoon'. And he surely could have done without the hostile reception that he’ll most certainly be getting from the crowds out here in India. But such is life. There are certain people who are revered not just as demi-Gods but God itself! And when that “God” happens to hail from a country with which you still have to do serious business with, you better be careful of what you say!
But then come to think of this! Was Gilchrist a saint during his cricketing days? He’ll be the 1st to deny this. We all saw that during that Sydney Test that he was far from being a saint. But does that stop him from pointing fingers at something or someone that he feels was not quite correct! Heck, why should it? I mean, from when did “two wrongs begin to make one right”? I may be the most dreaded gangster in the world but that does not mean I lose my right to have an opinion on a certain xyz! I'd hate it if someone said 'yes' to that. And folks, make no mistake. This isn’t some below average Abdur Razzaq or a frustrated and pessimistic Javed Miandad levelling accusations. Adam Gilchrist, much like Sachin Tendulkar has been a trendsetter in the game of cricket. Bowlers all over the world are known to have more scared bowling to him than to any other batsman; and yes, for all that Sydney fiasco, Gilly still wasn’t the most dishonest of men around either. One of the few [if not only] ‘walkers’ during his time, he continued to practise that ‘practice’ for most of his playing years despite having huge problems over the issue with his teammates [as revealed in excerpts of his autobiography]. Point is, he did what his heart said was the “right” thing to do even if it meant making a few enemies in his own team. Adam Gilchrist may not have played for 19 years or may not have scored 12k runs and all that, but as far as pure “cricketing greatness” goes, he’s not far behind Sachin Tendulkar. Some might even put him ahead of the Bombay great.
And so to see, our cricket-crazy fans proving that they indeed are ‘cricket-crazy’ was such a shame really. Infact, the way our TV channels went ballistic showing little sense if at all by highlighting only one part of the story was even more of a shame. Apart from Pradeep Magazine, not one journalist had the sanity of appealing to the fans to show some ‘logic’ and ‘reason’. To see the otherwise likeable Srinivasan Jain almost sucking up to Sachin was a disgrace to say the least! As a veteran journalist and that too from a channel who surely doesn’t have to depend on histrionics to up their TRPs, surely better behavior and some common sense was expected.Now am I pointing fingers at Sachin and trying to imply something? No, I’m not! All I’m saying is that, Sachin like most of the greats who’ve played before him hasn’t had as faultless a career as people think. Come on baby! Why do we always point fingers at Andrew Symonds, our very own man has stopped 'walking' since such a long time now. Atleast on that front, Gilly has a superior record than what Sachin does.
Cut a long story short, we really need to show some ‘rationality’ in our thoughts and behavioral patterns. Yes, the genius from Bombay is by far the most blessed champion to have graced the game, atleast of his generation. That doesn’t mean we need to cut down other champions who may have an opinion on him. Especially in cases when that other champion too has had a solid reputation, not just as a cricketer but as someone who’s played the game in the most dignified manner. In this case between the two greats, the only way whereby things could have been clarified was through a mutual discussion between the two which apparently did take place. Things seemed to have been clarified and now they need to move on. Knowing the way they’ve conducted themselves in public so far, I’m sure they will indeed move on. But will the Indian public too ‘move on’? I seriously doubt. The ‘Church’ should brace himself for some real tough times in 2009. It was the ‘wooden spoon’ last time around. I’d be surprised if he’ll get that again but then the ‘wooden stick’ may not be too far behind. I hope I’m proved wrong but I’m pretty sure, I wont be!






.jpg)